Super regenerative receiver quench investigation
Mike Pinfold ZL1BTB
If you look it up on the web you can read all about it
test setup ,polyakov basic super regen self quenched with Quad demod board connectedSo I decided to investigate the claims of the Patent , I decided to use a PLL tone decoder as an FM demodulator running at nominally a quench frequency of 20 Khz , having had previous experience with NE567 as an FM AM demodulator at 455 Khz .. 20 Khz is achieved with a 4K7 variable resistor and a timing capacitor of 0.039 mfd .
I decided to make a self quenched super regen at around 25 Mhz using a grounded gate J310 Jfet oscillator configuration , I tuned the quench to be at about 20 Khz using the trim pot across the quench capacitor . I fed the unbypassed audio along with the quench frequency directly into the ne567 with its pll osc trimmed to about 20 Khz and picked off the audio out of the FM or AM pins of the NE567 and fed it to my bench top amplified speaker .
20kHZ QUAD DEMOD Circuit diagram
I used an Agilent signal generator as the signal source for the super regen detector , AM was a 1Khz tone at 80% mod and FM 1 Khz at 3KHz deviation for NBFM
circuit of poliakov super regen
NE567 PLL as AM/FM demodulator with grounded gate super regen at 25 MHz
I did have a play with the regeneration and quench frequency pots as there is a lot of interaction between them to optimise demodulation .I was able to monitor audio directly from the receiver
itself and to compare it to that demodulated via the NE567 ,
With careful adjustment you can demodulate 3 Khz deviation NBFM and listen directly but it is very fiddly to achieve and im not sure if the oscillator is still operating in the normal quenched mode
The recovered A.M audio level from the NE567 fm detector is much much louder
than the direct demodulated audio from the super regenerative detector , direct
level was xxx mV verses yyy mV
of demodulated AM via the FM detector . (Yet to
measure)
Neal brown did make the comment that the modulation of received signal is
impressed onto the quench frequency in the super regenerative mode and this
appears to happen ' So to check my measurements,
I also built up a standard
quadrature FM demodulator tuned for 20 Khz ,preceded by a single untuned
amplifier stage , I fed the unbypassed quench frequency into this demodulator
and received the same
result as the NE567 , the large audio improvement
demodulating the approx 20 Khz quench frequency
I looked at the quench frequency with an oscilloscope connected to the top of the quench capacitor with and without AM modulation
There is
NE567 PLL Decoder for AM/FM at 20 KHz
25MHz 1KHz 80% AM into receiver,
quench showing characteristic FM display
25 Mhz carrier only -80 dBm
So it appears that the AM received modulation definitely ends up by frequency modulating the quench waveform . Hence the excellent audio output level from the quench fm demodulator when compared to the "normally detected" audio output
As a matter of intrest the best sensitivity was hearing the 80% modulated test tone very noisey at -100 dBm ….. 2.24 uV in a 50 ohm system without an rf preamp ahead of the superregen. Going to try an rf preamp to see if I can improve this sensitivity figure and also isolate the oscillations from radiating out the antenna
I will next try an Externally quenched super regenerative receiver where I will use the same NE567 AM/FM decoder circuit for detection ,but I will use the square/triange wave form from the 20 Khz NE567 VCO to gate the rf oscillator in and out off "quenching" and see if the synchronous detection capability of that setup enables modulation to be achieved .
I noticed a potential problem for FM demodulators in super regen receivers
that are self quenched is that the quench frequency varies with rf amplitude and
regeneration voltage , so a fixed frequency demodulator like a quadrature form
,will not cope with quench frequency drift , the PLL can cope over a wider range
, so I decided to try a pulse counting FM demodulator since the quench frequency
can be down around 20 Khz or so where this type of demodulator can give a good
level of audio output because of the large ratio of change in pulse width to
carrier frequency . There are a number of pulse count demodulator circuits on
the internet most of them incorporated in domestic band wbfm receivers , where
the demodulated Intermediate frequency is between 200 KHz and 80 KHz . For WBFM
at 75 Khz deviation the down converted 200 to 80 Khz I.F. ( depending on the
design) Gives good signal to noise and fidelity response .The fact that the
quench frequency may wander around somewhat doesnt make a huge difference to the
demodulated audio level .
I built up a simple 2 transistor circuit copied from the web (vk2zay and others
) of a limiter and a pulse counting ( integrating) Monostable the output of
which is sent the a low pass filter to obtain the wanted audio
circuit of pulse counting FM demodulator
What I did for my circuit that operates at a lower frequency , was to
multiply the critical components like the capacitors by the scaling factor of
I.F frequency eg 200 divided by my circuit frequency of 20 ie ratio of 10 ... so
50 pf at 200 Khz becomes 500 pF at 20 Khz . Optimally the monostable should
really have two stages of I.F amplification ahead of it , but since I was not
going for fidelity here ,I only used one to test the principle .. well it worked
.
The super regen I tested it on had a quench amplitude of about 300 mV ,so that
was a resonable quench level to start with , I got the "pulse
counting" circuit going and played around with component values to optimise
the simple circuit I had .The recovered audio was very good and light years
ahead of the usual source of audio in the super regen I was using , I put this
down to the efficiency of the FM demodulation process rather that the usual
envelope detection process to obtain recovered audio .
I suspect the performance of the super regenerative detector gets let down by the audio chain after it I suspect the high amplitude of the quench frequency plays havoc with the audio chain , perhaps a well performing low pass filter, active or passive is required at the demodulated output .
What makes me think this is the spectrum analyser sweep of the audio output of the poliakov receiver from
100 Hz to 10kHz .This shows the RF test signal of -100 dBm at 10.96 MHz, modulated with a tone of 2Khz with very good signal to noise ratio. !!
This a reasonable signal that should sound clearer than it does I will try a
better low pass filter to see if I can get rid of the extraneous noise and
improve acoustic performance
I had built up some time ago a third order low pass active filter of the
sallen and Key, the circuit from VHF Comms 4/1969 "Active audio Filters D.E
Schmitzer DJ4BG so I pressed it into service ,it rolled off sharply above 3 Khz
it worked extremely well and it enabled me to now make s/n measurements with a
S/N meter
2 KHz modulation tone AM 80% mod good s/n visually !
The receiver is building up from random noise there is no coherent signal to
replace the noise so random noise predominates ??
This could correlate with the receiver spending slightly less time building
up from random noise as there is now some coherent rf stimulating oscillations
in the tuned circuit hence less noise is seen.????